Drinking from the
by Clint Bolick
The City of
This is called a "feasibility gap"-but the credibility gap is even wider. The city's own independent consultant estimated the feasibility gap at only $25 million.
The bottom line is much worse. Two experts hired by the Goldwater Institute in our constitutional challenge to the CityNorth subsidy have demonstrated that the developer will reap a huge profit even without the subsidy, and that the projected economic gains from the mall are grossly inflated.
Dr. Andrey Pavlov, visiting associate professor of real estate at the
Meanwhile, Arizona State University Professor Dave Wells, who holds a Ph.D. in political economy and public policy, found that the developer's projected annual economic impact was overstated by 75 percent, over $900 million per year. Moreover, most of the jobs generated by the project will pay wages far below Maricopa County's median salary. Only a few years ago Mayor Phil Gordon asked in the Phoenix Business Journal, "Why are we subsidizing jobs that don't provide at least enough of an income that provides a living wage?" Excellent question.
The mayor has also observed that major retailers need to learn there is no "constitutional right to drink from the public trough." Indeed. Taxpayers, on the other hand, do have a constitutional right not to pick up the tab for corporate handouts-and this is just the case to vindicate that right.
Clint Bolick is the director of litigation at the Goldwater Institute's Scharf-Norton Center for Constitutional Litigation.
No comments:
Post a Comment