by Christina Sandefur
Just six years ago, Arizonans enacted one of the nation’s strongest protections for property rights. That measure is Proposition 207, and it says the government must compensate you when regulations reduce your property value.
The latest attempt comes
from Sedona, which made it a crime to rent residential property for
fewer than 30 days, and the city defines “rent” very broadly. This means
property owners are subject to punishments of up to 6 months in jail
and/or a $2,500 fine for engaging in a wide range of activities,
including purchasing a time share, contracting for home improvements,
and even hiring a babysitter!
Attempting to avoid Prop
207 liability, the city of Sedona tried to masquerade the ordinance as a
“health and safety” regulation, which is exempted from Prop 207. But
the court of appeals saw through the façade and ruled that the city
can’t avoid Prop 207 by merely claiming to advance public health without
offering any evidence that the regulation actually does so.
On the taxpayers’ dime,
Sedona is challenging that decision in the Arizona Supreme Court. The
Goldwater Institute, which has long defended property owners from
government attempts to dilute or evade Prop. 207, is supporting Sedona
property owners in that case. In 2006, Arizonans demanded genuine
protections for their property. Cities should stop wasting taxpayer
resources trying to skirt the rules and start respecting their citizens’
rights.
Christina Sandefur is an attorney for the Goldwater Institute’s Scharf-Norton Center for Constitutional Litigation.
Learn more:
Goldwater Institute: Giving Property Owners Their Day in Court
Arizona Republic: Court: Owners must be paid for property value
Read the online version of this daily email here.
Learn more:
Goldwater Institute: Giving Property Owners Their Day in Court
Arizona Republic: Court: Owners must be paid for property value
Read the online version of this daily email here.
No comments:
Post a Comment