Friday, June 25, 2010
McCain hypocritically deletes free government grant information off his website today
Wow. After being exposed yesterday for hypocritically included lengthy information on how to apply for numerous government grants on his website, McCain has since hidden that information from his website. You can't see the tab linking to free government grant money behind the YouTube video (although you can see it on some browsers). Fortunately, I took screenshots of all the information. McCain should be ashamed of himself for attacking JD Hayworth for appearing in commercial for free government grants when McCain was promoting government grants on the front of his website, and received $9,400 in contributions from the owner of the company JD advertised for.
BEFORE
AFTER
HAYWORTH STATEMENT ON NATIONAL GRANTS CONFERENCES
| ||||||||||
|
Schweikert for Congress: Only 6 days left
Countdown… The urgent deadline is just days away. ![]() Will you help us reach our goal? Please make a donation TODAY - - not tomorrow; not next week; but TODAY because with your investment in our campaign we WILL DEFEAT the far-left Harry Mitchell. --And just what are the Democrats up to this week? In an email yesterday, Harry Mitchell’s campaign was boasting that he raised $11,000 in just minutes. Are we going to let Harry Mitchell get away with more of the same far-left tactics that he’s become notorious for - - opening his pockets to big money from Nancy Pelosi and the Democrat coughers; the unions; and the special interest pay-offs from votes on legislation like healthcare? NO - - it’s time for Harry Mitchell to GO! And we are standing strong to defeat him! We are more than half the distance to reaching our goal. Your $25, $50, or $100 contribution TODAY will get us there, so please make a donation right now. We will take back our government, and it starts right here in Arizona’s Fifth Congressional District. We will put an end to the bailouts, say no to government run healthcare, secure our borders and defend Arizona’s illegal immigration laws. ![]() We will fight to restore fidelity to the Constitution, defend the free enterprise system and end over-reaching government control. Please contribute today. Our winning battle plan will defeat Harry Mitchell. And our volunteer team is working harder than ever. With your contribution today, we will retire Harry Mitchell and end the lurch to the left. Can I count on your financial support today? I truly appreciate your help, ![]() ![]() |
|
Thursday, June 24, 2010
Come help JD Hayworth dial for dollars tonight and/or Satuday!
The latest Rasmussen poll shows McCain losing ground, he's lost 5 points and has only 47% of likely Republican primary voters, dangerous territory for an incumbent according to Scott Rasmussen. We can beat him! But we need your help. Please stop by and help us dial for dollars, we need folks not just Thursday but Saturday from 1-4pm. If you can only make a couple of hours during those blocks of time, come by anyways, every little bit counts.
RSVP on facebook (not required)
Thursday, June 24, 2010 |
4:00pm - 8:00pm |
JD campaign Phoenix headquarters |
3129 E. Cactus Rd. |
Phoenix, AZ |
RSVP on facebook (not required)
National Review's Mark Levin slams McCain's record - he's no conservative even on earmarks/spending
There’s a reason some of John McCain's conservative supporters avoid discussing his record. They want to talk about his personal story, his position on the surge, his supposed electability. But whenever the rest of his career comes up, the knee-jerk reply is to characterize the inquiries as attacks.
The McCain domestic record is a disaster. To say he fought spending, most particularly earmarks, is to nibble around the edges and miss the heart of the matter.
Read the rest of the article
The McCain domestic record is a disaster. To say he fought spending, most particularly earmarks, is to nibble around the edges and miss the heart of the matter.
Read the rest of the article
Wednesday, June 23, 2010
BIGGEST McCAIN FLIP-FLOP EVER
|
Schweikert for Congress: Urgent Appeal & Critical Deadline
Earlier this week, the Schweikert campaign went on the air with ad buys across Arizona’s Fifth District. ![]() My request to you now is urgent and critical -- Will you help the Schweikert campaign today with a contribution to help us stay on the air with our powerful ads! Our goal is to raise $15,000 by June 30th. Will you help us reach your goal with your most generous contribution today? Your help in my race will be the most important investment you can make in 2010. Make no mistake -- We will defeat the liberals this year. It’s time to replace Harry Mitchell and I will send him packing this November. --But we cannot win this November without your support. Harry Mitchell has the deep pockets of George Soros, Moveon-dot-org, and just about every liberal group in the country and wants to keep the Obama-Pelosi regime in power. …And just this week we learned news that the out-of-state unions are making their first sweep of our district to help Harry Mitchell. Lets send them a message today. No Way - - Not this year. We’re taking back our government, and we’re going to put a STOP to this lurch to the left! Our message of free enterprise, lower taxes, less government, personal freedom, and defending Arizona against illegal immigration will be heard loud and clear on Election Day. ![]() Can I count on you to help us reach our goal today? Together, we can make this the most powerful campaign against the far left. Only with your critical support can we truly send a message that we’re taking back our government. I want to thank you for your time and generous support, ![]() ![]() P.S. Please don’t delay. Your contribution today will help us keep our strong conservative message on air to defeat the liberals this November. |

|
If you wish to contact us, please do not reply to this email but instead go to www.David10.com/contact. To manage your subscription, or to be removed from our list, please click the link at the bottom of this email. |
![]() | ![]() |
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
Careful who you ask for money from
So, what happens when you try to raise money from someone who endorses your opponent? Read below.
note: actual e-mails addresses have been redacted. Further note; look how hard Romley is trying to play his status as a veteran. Unfortunately for him, Bill Montgomery is also a decorated war veteran.
|
AP: Bailout vote could claim two more GOP lawmakers (bad news for John McCain)
Some excerpts from the AP article -
One Republican senator lost his job because he voted for the 2008 bank bailout. Two other GOP lawmakers may be next.
Former President George W. Bush's lifeline to financial institutions is roiling GOP primaries, with Republicans who reluctantly supported it facing the ire of conservatives furious about budget-busting spending and tea partiers grousing that Wall Street came before Main Street.
Some GOP primary voters seem to be ignoring all that in what's shaping up to be an anti-establishment election year. Republican and Democratic pollsters alike say that when it comes to the bailout vote, people seem to see Washington and Wall Street in the same light — conspiring against taxpayers.
That's especially problematic for Republican lawmakers who face an electorate dominated by fiscal conservatives and tea party faithful. Thus, in dozens of House, Senate and gubernatorial races, Republican lawmakers are struggling to explain their support for a bailout that to many symbolizes government overreach.
"I had to make a decision based on the information that I had at the time. And I did. And I voted for it," four-term Rep. Gresham Barrett said last week, repeating a poll-tested answer during a South Carolina gubernatorial debate after opponent Nikki Haley asked him if his vote were a mistake.
He added: "Was it implemented like it should have been? No, it wasn't. And I am going to continue to fight to ensure that every dollar is returned to taxpayers and it never happens again."
Polls show Barrett trailing Haley — a state legislator who has the support of tea party activists — ahead of Tuesday's runoff for the GOP nomination. She beat him handily two weeks ago but didn't earn the 50 percent needed to win the nomination outright so the two are going head to head in a contest growing nastier by the day.
South Carolina six-term Rep. Bob Inglis, who also voted for the bailout, also finds himself explaining his bailout vote.
Challenger Trey Gowdy campaigned as a bailout opponent and made the race a referendum on Inglis' vote, casting the incumbent as not conservative enough for the district. Gowdy, the Spartanburg prosecutor, forced Inglis into a runoff.
Americans always were skeptical of the $700 billion package that Bush rolled out in 2008 after a series of bank failures. Any support that was there for the measure dropped significantly as top officials at bailed-out institutions were paid handsome bonuses and high salaries.
Two-thirds of Americans say the federal government shouldn't have helped U.S. banks and financial institutions, according to a CBS poll taken in May. And a CBS-New York Times survey in April found that only 39 percent said the bailout was necessary to emerge from the recession; 51 percent said the economy probably would have improved without it.
The warning shot to lawmakers who voted for the measure came last month when Sen. Bob Bennett lost his quest for a fourth term in conservative Utah. Conservatives at the GOP state convention punished him for his support of the bailout, officially known as the Troubled Asset Relief Program.
Businessman Tim Bridgewater and attorney Mike Lee will face each other Tuesday in the GOP primary. It's likely whoever wins will become the next Utah senator. A Democrat hasn't won a Senate race in Utah since 1970.
Earlier this year, the issue contributed to Texas Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison's loss in the Republican gubernatorial primary in Texas against Gov. Rick Perry; she was derided as "Kay 'Bailout' Hutchison."
Arizona Sen. John McCain is facing similar criticism.
He is taking heat for his vote from his GOP primary rival, former Rep. J.D. Hayworth, who points out McCain's support for the measure at every turn. Says Hayworth: "Despite trying to propagate a perception of fiscal responsibility, our friend Mr. McCain is in no position to lecture any of us."
One Republican senator lost his job because he voted for the 2008 bank bailout. Two other GOP lawmakers may be next.
Former President George W. Bush's lifeline to financial institutions is roiling GOP primaries, with Republicans who reluctantly supported it facing the ire of conservatives furious about budget-busting spending and tea partiers grousing that Wall Street came before Main Street.
Some GOP primary voters seem to be ignoring all that in what's shaping up to be an anti-establishment election year. Republican and Democratic pollsters alike say that when it comes to the bailout vote, people seem to see Washington and Wall Street in the same light — conspiring against taxpayers.
That's especially problematic for Republican lawmakers who face an electorate dominated by fiscal conservatives and tea party faithful. Thus, in dozens of House, Senate and gubernatorial races, Republican lawmakers are struggling to explain their support for a bailout that to many symbolizes government overreach.
"I had to make a decision based on the information that I had at the time. And I did. And I voted for it," four-term Rep. Gresham Barrett said last week, repeating a poll-tested answer during a South Carolina gubernatorial debate after opponent Nikki Haley asked him if his vote were a mistake.
He added: "Was it implemented like it should have been? No, it wasn't. And I am going to continue to fight to ensure that every dollar is returned to taxpayers and it never happens again."
Polls show Barrett trailing Haley — a state legislator who has the support of tea party activists — ahead of Tuesday's runoff for the GOP nomination. She beat him handily two weeks ago but didn't earn the 50 percent needed to win the nomination outright so the two are going head to head in a contest growing nastier by the day.
South Carolina six-term Rep. Bob Inglis, who also voted for the bailout, also finds himself explaining his bailout vote.
Challenger Trey Gowdy campaigned as a bailout opponent and made the race a referendum on Inglis' vote, casting the incumbent as not conservative enough for the district. Gowdy, the Spartanburg prosecutor, forced Inglis into a runoff.
Americans always were skeptical of the $700 billion package that Bush rolled out in 2008 after a series of bank failures. Any support that was there for the measure dropped significantly as top officials at bailed-out institutions were paid handsome bonuses and high salaries.
Two-thirds of Americans say the federal government shouldn't have helped U.S. banks and financial institutions, according to a CBS poll taken in May. And a CBS-New York Times survey in April found that only 39 percent said the bailout was necessary to emerge from the recession; 51 percent said the economy probably would have improved without it.
The warning shot to lawmakers who voted for the measure came last month when Sen. Bob Bennett lost his quest for a fourth term in conservative Utah. Conservatives at the GOP state convention punished him for his support of the bailout, officially known as the Troubled Asset Relief Program.
Businessman Tim Bridgewater and attorney Mike Lee will face each other Tuesday in the GOP primary. It's likely whoever wins will become the next Utah senator. A Democrat hasn't won a Senate race in Utah since 1970.
Earlier this year, the issue contributed to Texas Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison's loss in the Republican gubernatorial primary in Texas against Gov. Rick Perry; she was derided as "Kay 'Bailout' Hutchison."
Arizona Sen. John McCain is facing similar criticism.
He is taking heat for his vote from his GOP primary rival, former Rep. J.D. Hayworth, who points out McCain's support for the measure at every turn. Says Hayworth: "Despite trying to propagate a perception of fiscal responsibility, our friend Mr. McCain is in no position to lecture any of us."
Analysis of Hayworth-McCain Rasmussen poll: McCain dropped in points due to third-party candidate Deakin
Great article by Jim Kelley of The Cholla Jumps in the Tucson Citizen -
Clearly the lines are drawn. The support for JD Hayworth has remained consistent since his announcement in February. The support for Jim Deakin has come from disssatisfied McCain supporters as Deakin has risen fom nothing to 7% while McCains numbers fall. Hayworths task is to convince the dissatisfied former McCain supporters that he is more than what the McCain camp says about him. Regardless of where the Deakin voters come from, they noticeably hurt Hayworth and on August 24th, McCain would still win the primary.
The full press by the McCain camp is to discredit Hayworth so much that Deakin will start picking up Hayworth supporters.
Read the rest
Clearly the lines are drawn. The support for JD Hayworth has remained consistent since his announcement in February. The support for Jim Deakin has come from disssatisfied McCain supporters as Deakin has risen fom nothing to 7% while McCains numbers fall. Hayworths task is to convince the dissatisfied former McCain supporters that he is more than what the McCain camp says about him. Regardless of where the Deakin voters come from, they noticeably hurt Hayworth and on August 24th, McCain would still win the primary.
The full press by the McCain camp is to discredit Hayworth so much that Deakin will start picking up Hayworth supporters.
Read the rest
NY Times: "McCain is Now Running Just to Stay in Place"
Very revealing article from the New York Times on how fed up Arizonans are with McCain, confronting him angrily at town halls (note he has time to attend numerous town halls in Arizona, but not to debate JD Hayworth, says he has "a day job"). Some excerpts -
But less than two years after he was defeated by Barack Obama, nothing seems quite the same for Senator John McCain, who has gone from being his party’s candidate for president rallying 1,000 supporters at a Florida football stadium to furiously defending his Senate seat before 60 recession-weary residents in a Hampton Inn in Lake Havasu, Ariz.
Mr. McCain’s new position is one of defense: he is fending off a primary fight from the right flank of his party in the form of former Representative J. D. Hayworth, as well as withering criticism of his former position on immigration from constituents. He also seems to be engaged in a battle within himself, hewing to the high road, as he has historically done, but at times unleashing the anger he seems to feel about the outcome of the 2008 race.
Between the unusually late primary date of Aug. 24 — which could have an impact on turnout — and the volatility of an energized primary base that has never quite cottoned to Mr. McCain, his team is concerned enough to keep him pressing the flesh all his non-Washington days.
But just as often he squints as if he is bracing for a verbal blow. And he can shift from the animated Mr. McCain of past campaigns — quick with a joke or a warm “Thank you for your service” to a young mother whose husband is on his third tour to Iraq — to being uneasy and defensive about the parochial issues he finds himself hectored about.
“I’m not going to come in here and tell the local government what to do,” Mr. McCain snapped at Darla Tilley, director of the Parker center for the elderly, who pressed him in early June on the lack of nursing homes and assisted-living facilities in her county. A little while later, before leaving for his next stop, Mr. McCain pivoted to contrition. “I hope to be more like you,” he told her.
In an interview later, Ms. Tilley said she had been upset less by the exchange than by the fact that “the senator didn’t really seem to know or understand how many state-funded programs we have lost here.”
He never mentions Mr. Hayworth by name and has so far refused to debate him. “I have a day job,” he said in response to one voter who pressed him on this. McCain campaign officials refused numerous requests for interviews.
“We all know what happened after 9/11,” said one man in the audience here. “Why didn’t you close this border down? Where were you, Senator?”
The senator sparred at the library with a voter, Richard Martin, who took him to task for 15 minutes over his history of immigration legislation, his distaste for torture and his refusal to debate his opponent. “You won’t have any debates,” Mr. Martin fumed. “You’re afraid of J. D. Hayworth. The people in Arizona deserve debates.”
Repeatedly over three days, Mr. McCain was asked why he had supported “amnesty” for illegal immigrants in the past (“I never supported amnesty,” he says), and how he feels about a proposed state law intended to prevent children of illegal immigrants born in the United States from automatically becoming citizens. (He deflected the question.)
“My favorite bumper sticker is the one that says, ‘Don’t tell Obama what comes after a trillion,’ ” he said, using a reliable laugh line.
Editorial note: Telling that McCain jokes about the next level of money after a trillion considering McCain helped Obama along by voting for the billion dollar pork tarp bailouts
But less than two years after he was defeated by Barack Obama, nothing seems quite the same for Senator John McCain, who has gone from being his party’s candidate for president rallying 1,000 supporters at a Florida football stadium to furiously defending his Senate seat before 60 recession-weary residents in a Hampton Inn in Lake Havasu, Ariz.
Mr. McCain’s new position is one of defense: he is fending off a primary fight from the right flank of his party in the form of former Representative J. D. Hayworth, as well as withering criticism of his former position on immigration from constituents. He also seems to be engaged in a battle within himself, hewing to the high road, as he has historically done, but at times unleashing the anger he seems to feel about the outcome of the 2008 race.
Between the unusually late primary date of Aug. 24 — which could have an impact on turnout — and the volatility of an energized primary base that has never quite cottoned to Mr. McCain, his team is concerned enough to keep him pressing the flesh all his non-Washington days.
But just as often he squints as if he is bracing for a verbal blow. And he can shift from the animated Mr. McCain of past campaigns — quick with a joke or a warm “Thank you for your service” to a young mother whose husband is on his third tour to Iraq — to being uneasy and defensive about the parochial issues he finds himself hectored about.
“I’m not going to come in here and tell the local government what to do,” Mr. McCain snapped at Darla Tilley, director of the Parker center for the elderly, who pressed him in early June on the lack of nursing homes and assisted-living facilities in her county. A little while later, before leaving for his next stop, Mr. McCain pivoted to contrition. “I hope to be more like you,” he told her.
In an interview later, Ms. Tilley said she had been upset less by the exchange than by the fact that “the senator didn’t really seem to know or understand how many state-funded programs we have lost here.”
He never mentions Mr. Hayworth by name and has so far refused to debate him. “I have a day job,” he said in response to one voter who pressed him on this. McCain campaign officials refused numerous requests for interviews.
“We all know what happened after 9/11,” said one man in the audience here. “Why didn’t you close this border down? Where were you, Senator?”
The senator sparred at the library with a voter, Richard Martin, who took him to task for 15 minutes over his history of immigration legislation, his distaste for torture and his refusal to debate his opponent. “You won’t have any debates,” Mr. Martin fumed. “You’re afraid of J. D. Hayworth. The people in Arizona deserve debates.”
Repeatedly over three days, Mr. McCain was asked why he had supported “amnesty” for illegal immigrants in the past (“I never supported amnesty,” he says), and how he feels about a proposed state law intended to prevent children of illegal immigrants born in the United States from automatically becoming citizens. (He deflected the question.)
“My favorite bumper sticker is the one that says, ‘Don’t tell Obama what comes after a trillion,’ ” he said, using a reliable laugh line.
Editorial note: Telling that McCain jokes about the next level of money after a trillion considering McCain helped Obama along by voting for the billion dollar pork tarp bailouts
New Rasmussen poll: McCain drops below 50% down to 47%, 5 points, losing territory for an incumbent
Some excerpts from the article from Rasmussen Reports -
Any incumbent who earns less than 50% support is considered potentially vulnerable, and McCain has been hovering around that mark all year. Since January, McCain’s support has fallen in a narrow 47% to 53% range. Hayworth's support has generally been in the low 40s.
The 2008 Republican presidential nominee cannot be comforted by the fact that his level of support in early primary polling is similar to the numbers for another veteran senator, Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania. Specter, ultimately defeated in the state's Democratic Primary by Joe Sestak, led in just about all early polling but could never get much above the 50% level of support.
The latest Rasmussen Reports statewide telephone survey of Likely GOP Primary Voters in the state Voters shows McCain picking up 47% support, while challenger J.D.Hayworth earns the vote from 36%. Navy veteran and Tea Party activist Jim Deakin picks up seven percent (7%) support. One percent (1%) like another candidate in the race, and eight percent (8%) are undecided.
Last month, McCain led Hayworth 52% to 40%.
Thomas Seeks Goddard Action v. Tom Horne Fraud, Bankruptcy State Law Violation
Thomas Asks Goddard To Investigate Tom Horne’s Apparent Illegal Conduct In Arizona
Horne Should Release Additional Documents Surrounding Potential Fraud
PHOENIX, AZ. JUNE 21, 2010. Former Maricopa County Attorney and candidate for Attorney General Andrew Thomas demanded answers today from his Republican opponent, Tom Horne, following reported revelations Horne repeatedly failed to disclose a past bankruptcy in numerous official corporate filings with the State of Arizona—an apparent violation of state law. The bankruptcy was part of circumstances surrounding Horne’s lifetime ban from the Securities and Exchange Commission for financial fraud.
Thomas publicly called upon Attorney General Terry Goddard to appoint a special prosecutor to determine whether Horne violated state law in failing to disclose the bankruptcy in annual reports filed by Horne’s law firm with the Arizona Corporation Commission. And Thomas demanded that Horne authorize release of his application to become an attorney with the State Bar, as well as his application to work in the Arizona Attorney General’s Office previously. If Horne withheld information about his bankruptcy, Horne may have been authorized to practice law in Arizona under false pretenses and may lack bona fide credentials to continue to practice here.
Today, the Arizona Republic reported that from 1997 to 2000, Horne failed to disclose a past bankruptcy in official documents which he filed with the Arizona Corporation Commission and signed on behalf of his law firm. The article reported an investment firm started by Horne declared bankruptcy and Horne’s practices “led to him receiving a lifetime trading ban from the Securities and Exchange Commission.”
The Arizona Republic story did not include another Horne filing in 2002 in which he again failed to disclose his bankruptcy despite state law requiring so.
Horne was sanctioned by the SEC after he “attempted to induce the purchase and sale of securities when it did not have the required net capital.” Horne agreed to an SEC finding that he and his firm “willfully aided and abetted” in violations of federal securities laws. Horne subsequently relocated to Arizona. He has given, and continues, to give, inconsistent accounts of what transpired.
It is a violation of state law to file false annual reports with the Arizona Corporation Commission. And if Horne withheld information about his bankruptcy from his character and fitness application to the State Bar, he might have been admitted to the Arizona Bar under false pretenses.
Thomas noted Horne gave laughable responses to the Arizona Republic reporter. Horne blamed an accountant for the SEC-related problems, but said he could not remember the name of the accountant.
“The public deserves answers now,” Thomas said. “Tom Horne has admitted to willfully aiding and abetting in violations of federal securities laws. Now, it appears he violated state laws as well by not disclosing his bankruptcy in his law firm’s disclosure reports.”
He concluded, “Tom Horne has been accused of manipulating AIMS test scores by the Bush administration, which called his practices a ‘complete sham.’ He himself admitted to aiding and abetting violations of federal securities laws. Now he’s been caught apparently violating state law in not disclosing these facts here in Arizona. Can Tom Horne be trusted at all? He was a financial con artist before and is trying to be a political con artist today, attempting to fool primary voters he is a conservative when in fact he’s been a liberal on everything from amnesty to taxpayer funded abortions.”
Contact:
Jason Rose
Rose & Allyn Public Relations
602.791.4488
jrose@roseandallynpr.com
Horne Should Release Additional Documents Surrounding Potential Fraud
PHOENIX, AZ. JUNE 21, 2010. Former Maricopa County Attorney and candidate for Attorney General Andrew Thomas demanded answers today from his Republican opponent, Tom Horne, following reported revelations Horne repeatedly failed to disclose a past bankruptcy in numerous official corporate filings with the State of Arizona—an apparent violation of state law. The bankruptcy was part of circumstances surrounding Horne’s lifetime ban from the Securities and Exchange Commission for financial fraud.
Thomas publicly called upon Attorney General Terry Goddard to appoint a special prosecutor to determine whether Horne violated state law in failing to disclose the bankruptcy in annual reports filed by Horne’s law firm with the Arizona Corporation Commission. And Thomas demanded that Horne authorize release of his application to become an attorney with the State Bar, as well as his application to work in the Arizona Attorney General’s Office previously. If Horne withheld information about his bankruptcy, Horne may have been authorized to practice law in Arizona under false pretenses and may lack bona fide credentials to continue to practice here.
Today, the Arizona Republic reported that from 1997 to 2000, Horne failed to disclose a past bankruptcy in official documents which he filed with the Arizona Corporation Commission and signed on behalf of his law firm. The article reported an investment firm started by Horne declared bankruptcy and Horne’s practices “led to him receiving a lifetime trading ban from the Securities and Exchange Commission.”
The Arizona Republic story did not include another Horne filing in 2002 in which he again failed to disclose his bankruptcy despite state law requiring so.
Horne was sanctioned by the SEC after he “attempted to induce the purchase and sale of securities when it did not have the required net capital.” Horne agreed to an SEC finding that he and his firm “willfully aided and abetted” in violations of federal securities laws. Horne subsequently relocated to Arizona. He has given, and continues, to give, inconsistent accounts of what transpired.
It is a violation of state law to file false annual reports with the Arizona Corporation Commission. And if Horne withheld information about his bankruptcy from his character and fitness application to the State Bar, he might have been admitted to the Arizona Bar under false pretenses.
Thomas noted Horne gave laughable responses to the Arizona Republic reporter. Horne blamed an accountant for the SEC-related problems, but said he could not remember the name of the accountant.
“The public deserves answers now,” Thomas said. “Tom Horne has admitted to willfully aiding and abetting in violations of federal securities laws. Now, it appears he violated state laws as well by not disclosing his bankruptcy in his law firm’s disclosure reports.”
He concluded, “Tom Horne has been accused of manipulating AIMS test scores by the Bush administration, which called his practices a ‘complete sham.’ He himself admitted to aiding and abetting violations of federal securities laws. Now he’s been caught apparently violating state law in not disclosing these facts here in Arizona. Can Tom Horne be trusted at all? He was a financial con artist before and is trying to be a political con artist today, attempting to fool primary voters he is a conservative when in fact he’s been a liberal on everything from amnesty to taxpayer funded abortions.”
Contact:
Jason Rose
Rose & Allyn Public Relations
602.791.4488
jrose@roseandallynpr.com
Monday, June 21, 2010
Company behind the Informercial JD Hayworth appeared in donated $9,400 to McCain
You know the McCain mafia (so-called because of the threats McCain's people have made over the years to anyone who stands up to him, which have increased in force this election year) is REALLY desperate when they start attacking JD Hayworth for, as JD put it tonight on our Roundtable Politics interview, "things like waking up in the morning." The mafia's latest attack is criticizing Hayworth for appearing in an informercial on how to apply for government grants, for a company that was being looked at for airing misleading ads (JD had no idea). It was the same ad that former Congressman JC Watts initially appeared in and recommended to Hayworth. You'll notice that the McCain mafia isn't saying anything against JC Watts. If it really was a serious problem, they would be condemning Watts as well.
Listen to JD discuss the desperate attack earlier tonight on Roundtable Politics, below.
What the McCain mafia fails to tell you is that the founder of the company, Michael Millin, donated $9,400 to McCain's 2008 presidential campaign!
Listen to JD discuss the desperate attack earlier tonight on Roundtable Politics, below.
Interview with JD Hayworth & Sheriff Joe Arpaio
H/T Keith Sipmann and Sonoran Alliance
Arizona Patriot Caucus Chairman Keith Sipmann and Round Table Politics Host Marcus Kelley caught up with U.S. Senate Candidate, JD Hayworth and the worlds most famous (and toughest) Sheriff, Joe Arpaio, at Sheriff Arpaio’s Birthday Bash held at the Silver Spur in Cave Creek, Arizona on June 19th. Below is the two part interview regarding JD Hayworth’s position on illegal immigration, guest worker programs and Senator John McCain’s most recent waffling on the issues. We also asked the Sheriff why he was throwing his support behind JD Hayworth and what he thought about parts of Arizona being restricted to legal Americans because of the illegal immigration issue.
Arizona Patriot Caucus Chairman Keith Sipmann and Round Table Politics Host Marcus Kelley caught up with U.S. Senate Candidate, JD Hayworth and the worlds most famous (and toughest) Sheriff, Joe Arpaio, at Sheriff Arpaio’s Birthday Bash held at the Silver Spur in Cave Creek, Arizona on June 19th. Below is the two part interview regarding JD Hayworth’s position on illegal immigration, guest worker programs and Senator John McCain’s most recent waffling on the issues. We also asked the Sheriff why he was throwing his support behind JD Hayworth and what he thought about parts of Arizona being restricted to legal Americans because of the illegal immigration issue.
HAYWORTH TO ADDRESS LD 10 MEETING TONIGHT - 8pm
| ||||||||||
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)