tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8332146029615260022.post3632147501119085630..comments2024-02-06T06:49:22.752-07:00Comments on IC Arizona: JD Hayworth trounces MSNBC's liberal Rachel Maddow in TV interviewUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8332146029615260022.post-80176590618917175872010-03-17T12:40:43.116-07:002010-03-17T12:40:43.116-07:00this woman has an agenda like most of the liberal ...this woman has an agenda like most of the liberal media. she had no attention of doing a unbias interview. all she wanted to do was push her opinions and views via an interview with anyone conservative. this is so very typical of mainstream liberal media today. they have really become equivalent to the likes of the enquirer and people magazine. very sad.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8332146029615260022.post-63588108115444072142010-03-17T11:34:14.704-07:002010-03-17T11:34:14.704-07:00I commend JD for going on the Rachel Maddow show a...I commend JD for going on the Rachel Maddow show as I KNOW that he recognized it as a hostile interview. It took courage to go there knowing you'd be attacked twelve ways to Sunday. The viewing audience of the Rachel Maddow show are a waste of time for him though. Number one, they are all progressives. No way any one of them would ever vote Republican anyway. Number two, her audience is whosiwhatzithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03803296928293501809noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8332146029615260022.post-57735972623595083962010-03-16T22:00:05.623-07:002010-03-16T22:00:05.623-07:00although i thought rachel's position on the sa...although i thought rachel's position on the same sex wording was a little stronger,i agree the wording was vague enough that she shouldn't have argued with him that passionately. it was ambiguous and not inherently clear one way or the other.<br /><br /> signed, a fair minded liberal.dale grahamnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8332146029615260022.post-44526317774096010092010-03-16T19:48:22.834-07:002010-03-16T19:48:22.834-07:00Clearly, JD was articulating his "interpretat...Clearly, JD was articulating his "interpretation" of the same-sex ruling in Massachusetts, not quoting the language of the ruling. And, he never said "horse" was in the ruling, either.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07663843325503096454noreply@blogger.com